Wednesday, March 10th, 2010 at
6:59 pm
Purchase decision based on the interest not 3 years offered by
amazon and other comments of television. I had a widescreen HDTV CRT
Sony with an image that amavo and I knew that didn ‘ t want to an LCD. All LCD that had seen tend to give a “cartoonish”mirar to an image. The edges of the objects are almost too strong, giving them an unnatural appearance (personal opinion). I think still that seems great CRT image (especially black), but only “already offer t. This is my first product advertising, i are really a fan of
Sony, when it is tv.” the window, the advertising landscape was better than expected. Once adjusted with a video dvd of origin, which improved essentials. I has tweeked some more (only from the eye), and the landscape is impressive. “Once when I see some “artifacts”motion scenes quickly, but in reality has in their opinion be trying.” Speakers are a bit weak, but I have a nice surround sound for movies and tv system aren speakers ‘ important t for me. I also had problems pulling HD stations from my antenna when associated with television. My direct box does not work better. Hard to believe that only 4 years ago that I paid more for my crt “widescreen made for this 50″ 34
sony, but technology plasma that s It. I hope only refine new OLED, technology in 4 years that could be ready to trade my advertising. In General, I believe that a product every 10 8.
[answer]
Tuesday, March 9th, 2010 at
3:28 pm
I had the product for more than a month, are therefore qualified for a
review. This TV is impressive. In reality has been recently classified Consumer Reports as best tlevision HD. Al plasma not only, but global.
Excelente.Sin right picture box was configuration issues, engines took the money and show in booth and sure worked first left.
Don ‘ concern for the burning of screen t in and other negative refers to the plasma.non tv are a problem with the tv and that the money can get a great tv for a menor.Encanta price and recommend it.
[answer]